Leviticus 22:20 Commentary - Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
(20) But whatsoever hath a blemish.—Better. whatsoever hath, &c, without the “but,” which is not in the original, and is not wanted. The general rule is here repeated as an introduction to the cases which are immediately to be specified. It will be seen that only quadrupeds are given and that fowls are not alluded to, because when people brought birds the Law did not require any distinction to be made between male and female, and during the second Temple no blemish disqualified a bird except the entire absence of a limb.
Consult other comments:
Leviticus 22:20 - Adam Clarke's Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Leviticus 22:20 - Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
Leviticus 22:20 - John Gill's Exposition of the Entire Bible
Leviticus 22:20 - John Trapp's Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Ellicott's Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

Charles John Ellicott (1819 - 1905) was a distinguished English Christian theologian, academic and churchman. He briefly served as Dean of Exeter, then Bishop of the united see of Gloucester and Bristol.
His works include:
- An Old Testament Commentary for English Readers, 1897. (Editor)
- A New Testament Commentary for English Readers, 1878.